Deepak Sandhu was the Information Commissioner hearing the appeal. The Deputy Secretary, Rajiv Mittal, had also been summoned.
The appeal was not be heard by Deepak Sandhu because she is not assigned the constitutional subjects. Yet, she passed an order.
The order is also not a speaking order, which means she should have explained her own reasons (in the sections of "Decision") and countering my reasons to justify her judgment.
I am more irritated by absence of an explanatory order than by the dismissal itself.
2 comments:
This is something which was probably expected. However the matter of fact but shock is how they could be so irresponsible that without any proper response they gave their verdicts.
This had been a legal issue hence an explanation is expected, yet we being India have got used to such expectations. Isn't it!
But we highly appreciate your stand and concern over for everyone's benefits and equal rights.
Between, you did not lose, you have gained respect in our eyes and we wish that you continue your spirit and keep your high thinking with grace!
Post a Comment